Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Goumas v. Freeman Law PLLC
as 2:2019cv04448
Defendant:
Freeman Law PLLC
Plaintiff:
Avgi Goumas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv04395
Defendant:
James Patrick Williams, Wells Fargo Bank, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03758
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Verlon Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03102
Plaintiff:
Nicko Freeman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02675
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Freeman and Belinda Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01237
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jamal King
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa Correctional Health Services and Richard Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2018cv01015
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN RE: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) Litigation
as 2:2009md02119
Plaintiff:
Abdolhamid Ahmadi, William C Barlow, Lady Jennifer Barone and others
Defendant:
AIG United Guaranty Corporation, Aegis Wholesale Corporation, AmTrust Bank and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Intervenor:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Freeman v. Phoenix Police Department
as 2:2017cv01790
Plaintiff:
Eric Clyde Freeman
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01542
Plaintiff:
Daroy Freeman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
