Cases 21 - 30 of 75
ALVAREZ v. USA
as 1:2017cv00984
Petitioner:
ERIC FRANCISCO ALVAREZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Flowers et al
as 5:2017ct03215
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lyndell Davis
Defendant:
Ernie Flowers and Mark Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez et al v. Ham Farms, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Adan Lopez , Francisco Mendez , Ezequiel Aburto-Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Ham Farms, LLC , Ham Farms, Inc., Ham Produce, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez et al v. Ham Farms, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jose Jimenez-Olivarez, Adan Lopez, Ezequiel Aburto-Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Ham Produce, LLC, Cirila Garcia-Pineda, 5 G Harvesting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez-Zarate et al v. Serna
as 7:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Miguel Lopez-Zarate , Ivan Ariel Baez-Quiazco , Jose Andres Barroso-Pacheco and others
Defendant:
Ruben Serna
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Francisco et al
as 5:2017mc00018
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Emilio Francisco, PDC Capital Group, LLC, Caffe Primo International, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Thomas A. Seaman
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
HEBERT et al v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
JACQUEZ-RENE HEBERT , SARA BENSON , CAROL MURPHY and others
Defendant:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. and RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023
Mares v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2016mc00040
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Mares
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Vasquez v. USA
as 3:2016cv00644
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Ernesto Garcia Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arrollo-Silva v. USA
as 5:2016cv00730
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Arrollo-Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
