Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Long v. Gill et al
as 6:2011cv06284
Defendant:
Gordon Gill, Lane County Sheriff's Office, Douglas Osborne and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gille v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00705
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Hillery W. Gille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Gill v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Latter-Day Saints and Successor
as 3:2008cv00324
Plaintiff:
Mark Gill
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Latter-Day Saints and Successor, Corporation of the President of the Church of Latter-Day Saints and Successor and Corporation of the President of the Church of Latter-Day Saints and Successor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Padgett v. Kowanda et al
as 3:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Vincent Padgett
Defendant:
Anton Kowanda, Chris Schaefer, Scott Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bravo v. City of Hubbard et al
as 6:2007cv01783
Plaintiff:
Rene Bravo
Defendant:
City of Hubbard, David Dryden and William Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gill v. Schiedler
as 3:2007cv06157
Petitioner:
Denorval Gill
Respondent:
Robert Schiedler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00812
Plaintiff:
Verita Gill
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
