Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Simulis v. Land Carriers, Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Vyto Simulis
Defendant:
Land Carriers, Inc. and Guillermo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales et al v. Nelson et al
as 4:2014cv00092
Defendant:
Bulls-Eye Express, Inc. and James Edward Nelson
Plaintiff:
Jose Mario Gonzales and Juan Guillermo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Conversion
HSBC Bank USA v. Gonzalez
as 7:2014cv00956
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA
Defendant:
Guillermo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
BERMUDEZ RODRIGUEZ v. DEMOLITION KING, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv20991
Plaintiff:
OSCAR BERMUDEZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DEMOLITION KING, INC. and Guillermo Gonzalez
Counter_claimant:
Guillermo Gonzalez and DEMOLITION KING, INC.
Counter_defendant:
OSCAR BERMUDEZ RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Velazquez et al v. FPS, LP d/b/a Office Furniture Connection et al
as 4:2013cv01563
Defendant:
FPS LP , Vincent Oddo Interior Service Inc. , Furniture Procurement Services, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Moises Velazquez , Fredy Moreno , Ever Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Gonzalez
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
US v. Vasquez
as 12-2282
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE NORBERTO VASQUEZ, a/k/a Juan Guillermo Gonzalez, a/k/a Pedro Barota
Guillermo Gonzalez v. M D Biter
as 5:2012cv01760
Respondent:
M D Biter
Petitioner:
Guillermo Gonzalez
Haughton et al v. USA Dry Van Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv21853
Plaintiff:
Ernest Haughton and Lemuel Haughton
Defendant:
USA Dry Van Logistics, LLC, USA Logistics Carriers, LLC, USA LOG CARRIERS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
