Cases 21 - 30 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GAYLE v. DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #13188 et al
as 2:2019cv01829
Plaintiff:
JASON GAYLE
Defendant:
DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #13188 and DOLGEN CORP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAYLE v. YOURWAY TRANSPORT, INC.
as 2:2018cv05142
Defendant:
YOURWAY TRANSPORT, INC.
Plaintiff:
DEVON GAYLE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Green v. Pan et al
as 1:2018cv01962
Defendant:
Gayle B. Ryan, United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Petit et al v. Penske Truck Leasing Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael Petit , Kristina Petit , Gayle Marie Petit and others
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. , Transervice Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES et al v. PETER HODGE TRANSPORT LTD.
as 5:2017cv04967
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUGHES and GAYLE HUGHES
Defendant:
PETER HODGE TRANSPORT LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. CORTES
as 2:2016cv05524
Plaintiff:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA , MONICA MORRILL , RALPH E. WIKE, III and others
Defendant:
PEDRO A. CORTES
Movant:
CEIBA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States Of America v. Thomas
as 4:2016cv01405
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Gayle L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
GAYLE v. BURD et al
as 5:2016cv02124
Plaintiff:
WAYNE S. GAYLE
Defendant:
BRIAN BURD, SALVATORE CRISAFULLI, EASTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KERR et al v. PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv00741
Plaintiff:
BARRY KERR and GAYLE KERR
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
