Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Gibbs v. Nicol et al
as 2:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Michael Gibbs
Defendant:
Solomon Nicol and First Coast Logistics of Jacksonville Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibbs v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Linda Gibbs
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis v. West
as 2:2015cv00944
Plaintiff:
Gibbs Davis
Defendant:
Taylor M. West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adamson et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02057
Plaintiff:
Georgia Adamson , Lotrice Amison , Nicole Anthony and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnold et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02049
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Arnold , Teresa Austin , Clevia Beal and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibbs v. Wilson, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00645
Plaintiff:
Debra K. Gibbs
Defendant:
Wilson, LLC, James R. Wilson, III and Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Bonita C. Gibbs
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Huntsville Municipal Court et al v. Guffey et al
as 5:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
Huntsville Municipal Court, State of Alabama, City of Huntsville and others
Defendant:
Lynnzie Quiarra Varise Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
Lashonja Gibbs
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
