Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
David Muransky v. Eric Isaacson, et al
as 16-16783
Interested Party - Appellant:
ERIC ALAN ISAACSON
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID S. MURANSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GODIVA CHOCOLATIER, INC., a New Jersey corporation
James Price v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., et al
as 16-16486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID S. MURANSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Interested Party - Appellant:
JAMES H. PRICE and ERIC ALAN ISAACSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GODIVA CHOCOLATIER, INC., a New Jersey corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv23324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
as 0:2015cv60716
Plaintiff:
David S. Muransky
Defendant:
Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. v. Cosmetic Warriors
as 1:2012cv04623
Plaintiff:
Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
Defendant:
Cosmetic Warriors Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Smith v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02201
Plaintiff:
Evelyn D. Smith
Defendant:
Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GEOTAG, INC. v. YAKIRA, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
GEOTAG, INC.
Defendant:
YAKIRA, L.L.C. , ACE HARDWARE CORP. , AEROPOSTALE, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
BELK, INC.
Counter_defendant:
GEOTAG, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kristie Ghazal v. Godiva Chocolatier,Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv07840
Defendant:
Does and Godiva Chocolatier,Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristie Ghazal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
