Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Harrell v. Wright
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Quinyatte Jarmaine Harrell
Defendant:
Shannon Kathleen Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HARRELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01961
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ROCHILLA L. HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01602
Petitioner:
ANTHONY HARRELL, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HARRELL v. USA
as 1:2016cv01528
Petitioner:
ANTHONY HARRELL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BROWN v. DR. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LYNN BROWN, Jr.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, J. F. CARAWAY, DR. MICKEY CHO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Toni Fabre Harrell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HARRELL v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01803
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
SHARI L. HARRELL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HARRIS v. WATTS et al
as 2:2014cv00307
1 Thru 6:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS
Defendant:
HARRELL WATTS and JOYCE ZOLDAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, JOHN CARAWAY, JOHN AND JANE DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICALS and others
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
