Cases 21 - 30 of 197
LIPSCOMB v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01073
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
HARVEY LIPSCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Harvey v. Scarantino
as 5:2020hc02212
Petitioner:
Jokwan Lamar Harvey
Respondent:
Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mungro v. Tate et al
as 3:2020cv00605
Defendant:
Kevin Tate, John Gleason, PSI Agent and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Mungro, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Great Southern Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2020cv00593
Defendant:
Great Southern Life Insurance Company, Harvey W. Watts & Co., Inc. and Harvey W. Watt & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
John W. Thomas
SHANNON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00952
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, KAREN STEINOUR and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00943
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
DYREL NOWELL, GEORGE MOORE and CLINTON SKINNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHEWSON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00951
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
GARRISON MATHEWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHEWSON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00944
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
MELANIE MATHEWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00953
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, KAREN STEINOUR, KENNETH LASSITER and others
Plaintiff:
ARNETTA SHEARD, TAMMY SHANNON and DYREL ROSA SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
