Cases 21 - 30 of 918
Mack v. Henderson et al
as 3:2024cv00709
Defendant:
Proficient Auto Transport, Inc., William Henderson, III and Proficient Auto, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denovias Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henderson v. Price
as 3:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Tisha Henderson
Defendant:
John Wiley Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Guillory v. Henderson
as 4:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Guillory
Defendant:
Rand Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bowie County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Devonta D Henderson
Defendant:
Bowie County Jail, Bowie County Public Defender Office, Bowie County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. USA
as 7:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Lionel Desaun Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas v. Becerra
as 4:2023cv04799
Plaintiff:
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast, Ascension Providence, Ascension Seton d/b/a Ascension Seton Hays and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Henderson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Danielle Henderson
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cho v. Crystal D. Henderson
as 4:2023cv04823
Plaintiff:
Geohn Cho
Defendant:
Crystal D. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Krishna et al
as 1:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Kris B. Krishna, Michael Swan, Tatiana Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
