Cases 21 - 30 of 604
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Shoop et al
as 2:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Martin, III
Defendant:
Tim Shoop, Corby Free and Clark Goble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ludwick v. Teague et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Ludwick
Defendant:
Capt. Brandon Teague, C.O. Nathan Rook, C.O. Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Harcha
as 1:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Emery F. Williams
Defendant:
Judge Howard H. Harcha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2023cv02234
Plaintiff:
Cameron Howard
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company and Ohio Department of Medicaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Howard v. May
as 1:2023cv01174
Petitioner:
Raysean Howard
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01571
Plaintiff:
Sherry Howard
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Watson
as 3:2023cv00861
Petitioner:
James M. Howard
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Martin, III
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
