Cases 21 - 30 of 238
Howell v. Justice Court 3-1 of Collin County
as 3:2022cv01632
Plaintiff:
Nicole Howell and Nicole A Howell
Defendant:
Justice Court 3-1 of Collin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howell v. City of Austin
as 1:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
Justin Howell
Defendant:
City of Austin
Guardian Ad Litem:
J. Luke Dow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell et al v. Ector County et al
as 7:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Mary Howell, Wallace Howell and Precious Waites
Defendant:
Ector County and Ector County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2022cv01530
Plaintiff:
William R. Howell and Faye Howell
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
McCoy v. Townsend et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Wesley McCoy
Defendant:
Lonnie E Townsend, IV, Michael A Collum, David A. Stebbins and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Supervisor Jennifer Sanders, Maribel Perez, Carrie Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Stafford et al
as 6:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Miller
Defendant:
John Stafford, David Langston, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Stebbins et al
as 6:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Wesley McCoy
Defendant:
David Stebbins, Supervisor Jennifer Sanders, Maribel Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Holmes v. Howell
as 1:2021cv00967
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Holmes
Defendant:
Dustin M. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntyre v. Noble Drilling (U.S.) LLC et al
as 4:2021cv03384
Plaintiff:
Howell C McIntyre
Defendant:
Noble Drilling (U.S.) LLC, Noble Drilling Services, Inc., Shell Oil Company and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
