Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Conn v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Dallas Conn
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitley v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Whitley
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Thomas May
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Hayes
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shaw
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamerson v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Michael C. Jamerson
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Morris
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Baker et al
as 4:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Long
Defendant:
Jean Peters Baker, Jordan R Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Leigh v. Hancock
as 4:2022cv01342
Petitioner:
Christopher Dean Leigh
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
