Cases 21 - 30 of 72
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 5:2013cv04667
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE SHELTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER , RYAN COSTELLO , KATHI COZZONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEALY et al v. KANE et al
as 2:2013cv04614
Plaintiff:
TERANCE HEALY and TODD M. KRAUTHEIM
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE , LUTHER STRANGE, MICHAEL GERAGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HYNSON v. WILSON et al
as 2:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
SHAMEK HASAN HYNSON
Defendant:
ROBERT WILSON, EDWARD MCFADDEN, MORGAN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Healy v. USA
as 1:2012cv02412
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sean N. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HEALY v. SHIELDS et al
as 2:2012cv06636
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. HEALY
Defendant:
WILLIAM F. SHIELDS, HAVERFORD POLICE DEPT, HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2012cv05673
Plaintiff:
BRUCE C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, RONALD PHILLIPS, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGUIAR v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv05266
Plaintiff:
JASON J. AGUIAR
Defendant:
MICHAEL THOMPSON , BRETT WEAVER , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. WHITE et al
as 2:2012cv03860
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. WOOD, IV
Defendant:
CARROLE WHITE, MICHAEL GREENE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMSEL v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2012cv03242
Plaintiff:
RYAN SAMSEL
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, MCFADDEN, JACK HEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
