Cases 21 - 30 of 438
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Richards v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richards
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Stephens et al
as 1:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gabriel Holmes
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, Bill Stephens, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes, et al v. XL Specialty Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry (Bud) Holmes, Jay House, Channing Kammlah and others
Defendant:
XL Specialty Insurance Company
Intervenor:
Ross Glenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Amezquita v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Richard Luis Amezquita
Defendant:
E Holmes, Crystal Breauz, Isaac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beason v. Warden Holmes
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Beason
Defendant:
Warden Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Baker Hughes
as 4:2023cv02171
Plaintiff:
Richard Holmes
Defendant:
Baker Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanous v. King et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Vanous
Defendant:
Darious D. King, FNU Holmes and FNU Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miranda v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Domingo Miranda
Defendant:
Mr. Holmes, Mr. Flannel and Mr. Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
