Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCcc Sportswear, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
MCcc Sportswear, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Castaneda v. Department of Homeland Security Immigration & Customs Enforcement
as 7:2009cv00047
Petitioner:
Ricardo Renteria Castaneda
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ibarra-Villalva et al v. United States of America et al
as 7:2008cv00181
Petitioner:
Felix Ibarra-Villalva, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America, Department of Homeland Security, Immigration Naturalization Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ibarra-Villalva v. USA et al
as 7:2008cv00174
Petitioner:
Felix Ibarra-Villalva, Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nongkouni v. Prindel et al
as 2:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jacques Nongkouni
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Imam et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2007cv00295
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Imam and Erika Imam
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Mark Hansen, Emilio T. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
