Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Buford et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv08336
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Buford and Samia Hooper
Defendant:
Byron Brown, Press Box, Unknown Security Officers at the Press Box and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Crawley v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2011cv50308
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Crawley
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Rebecca Anderson, Joshua Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Davis et al
as 2:2010cv02156
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Chris Davis, Teddy Hooper, Will Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Seven Palm Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv02755
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Seven Palm Investments, LLC, Peter P. Veugeler, Cardiovascular Sciences, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Hooper v. Ryan, et al
as 1:2010cv01809
Petitioner:
Murray Hooper
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2009cv04553
Plaintiff:
Stevie Jackson
Defendant:
Cook County, Tom Dart, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. Bogan et al
as 1:2009cv01344
Plaintiff:
David Fuentes
Defendant:
Aeisha T. Bogan, L. Hooper, L. Warren and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuff v. 3M Company
as 1:2008cv04660
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Tuff, Mary E. Tuff, Reginald Tyler and others
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Company, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2008cv04404
Plaintiff:
Victor Johnson, Steve Green, Archie Brown and others
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvador Godinez, Tom Klist and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
