Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Gadsden, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01682
Plaintiff:
Dennis Mitchell
Defendant:
Gadsden, City of, Gary Parker , Mike Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Rathman et al
as 1:2012cv03653
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Hopper
Defendant:
John T. Rathman, Irena Merk and Deborah Locke
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Rathman et al
as 1:2012cv02045
Petitioner:
Benjamin A Hopper
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hopper et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Eddy Jay Hopper , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Hopper et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hopper and DeRamus
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Price et al
as 4:2009cv01801
Petitioner:
David Byron Hopper
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ball v. Riley et al
as 4:2008cv01053
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr
Defendant:
Bob Riley, D. Burrell, D. Wise and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nesbitt v. Hopper
as 4:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Larry Nesbitt
Defendant:
Hopper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
