Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hopper v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00195
Petitioner:
Martineous Leon Hopper
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hopper v. USA
as 3:2016cv00103
Petitioner:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hopper v. USA
as 3:2015cv00542
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barringer v. Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America et al
as 3:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha M Barringer
Defendant:
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America and Perry Hopper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Hopper v. USA
as 1:2012cv00124
Petitioner:
Martineous Leon Hopper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hopper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Eddie Roscoe Hopper and Leslie Roxane Hopper
Defendant:
3M Company, A. W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hopper v. USA
as 1:2008cv00442
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Martineous Leon Hopper
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hopper v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00372
Plaintiff:
Angeline D Hopper
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
FSC Securities Corporation v. Chandler et al
as 3:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
FSC Securities Corporation and FSC Securities Corporation
Defendant:
James M. Chandler, Richard D. Hopper, Shirley P. Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
HOPPER et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANKLIN HOPPER and KAY HOPPER
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
