Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06468
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", customerfirst2015, to-the-better and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Xue et al v. J&B Spartanburg LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00340
Plaintiff:
Yong Le Xue , Xing Long Luo and Yong Jun Fu
Defendant:
J&B Spartanburg LLC, Wai Leung Sim, Zhi Jie Shao and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zheng v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv07528
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Hua Zheng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zheng v. Holder
as 14-2822
Petitioner:
Lian Hua Zheng
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Zheng v. Holder
as 13-4149
Petitioner:
Hua Zheng
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Zhen Zhao, et al v. Attorney General United State
as 13-3845
Petitioner:
ZHEN LE ZHAO and ZENG HUA ZHENG
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Yu Zheng v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-2079
Petitioner:
YU HUA ZHENG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Xiu Zheng v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-1592
Petitioner:
XIU ZHEN ZHENG, a/k/a Xue Hua Zheng, a/k/a Farzeea Binte Abu Bakar Falli
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Fajardo et al v. Ayogu Japanese Restuarant, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03080
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fajardo , Gabriel Fajardo and Wilfrido Cali
Defendant:
Ayogu Japanese Restuarant, Inc. , Ayogu Japanese Cuisine, Inc., Ayama Fusion Cuisine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zheng v. Holder
as 13-937
Petitioner:
Guihua Zheng, AKA Gui Hua Zheng
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
