Cases 21 - 30 of 246
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kirk M. Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only) and General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pinkston v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Sy-Bron L Pinkston
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of, Susan Hughes, Christopher Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Hughes
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nicolas B Martinez
Defendant:
Shay J Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Hughes
as 3:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Nicolas B Martinez
Defendant:
Shay J Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00485
Petitioner:
THOMAS L. HUGHES
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HUGHES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
RON N HUGHES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
HUGHES-SHAFER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01967
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HUGHES-SHAFER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PARKER v. TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01914
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN PARKER
Defendant:
TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHAWN KEEN, LANCE SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Bartole v. Hughes et al
as 2:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Bartole
Defendant:
Shay Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
