Cases 21 - 30 of 199
Vaughn et al v. Kentuckiana Surgical Specialists, P.S.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn and Douglas Vaughn
Defendant:
Kentuckiana Surgical Specialists, P.S.C., Kevin A. O'Koon, Michael G. Hughes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Carroll v. Boyd et al
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Carroll
Defendant:
Brad Boyd, Christian County Jail, Wendall Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Fields
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamar Hughes
Defendant:
Marc Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hughes
as 7:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Jason J. Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. Fields
as 3:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamar Hughes
Defendant:
Marc Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Hughes
as 0:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Ronald C. Fairchild
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pollard v. Hughs
as 7:2022cv00028
Petitioner:
Deangelo Pollard
Respondent:
Craig Hughs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pollard v. Hughs
as 4:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Deangelo Pollard
Respondent:
Craig Hughs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Hughs et al
as 2:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
Terry Jones
Respondent:
Craig Hughs, Daniel Cameron and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Hughes et al
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Jordan and Austin Jordan
Defendant:
K. Hughes, Officer Farmer and Fayette County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
