Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Mayo et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01418
Plaintiff:
Leevella Mayo , Lakeisha Tomlin , Z'Niyla Gallaspy and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , General Motors Company , Takata Seat Belts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Bloomquist v. Sheldon et al
as 1:2015cv01398
Plaintiff:
Grant Bloomquist
Defendant:
Jeremy Sheldon, John Ireland, Nathan Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canfield v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dawn Canfield
Defendant:
Douglas County, Douglas County Department of Human Services, Arapahoe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Vigil et al
as 1:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Defendant:
Vigil, (I) Vigil, Ippel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garewal v. U.S. Marshall et al
as 1:2012cv02348
Plaintiff:
Milton Bradley Garewal
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall, Crum, (I) Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Flores et al
as 1:2012cv02249
Plaintiff:
Felectia A. Johnson and Felectia (I) Johnson
Defendant:
Sergio Flores and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00918
Plaintiff:
Jeramiah Houston
Defendant:
David Williams, David (I) Williams, Terry Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riggan v. Glendale, Colorado, City of et al
as 1:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Riggan
Defendant:
City of Glendale, Colorado, The , Chris Tyrolt , Chris (I) Tyrolt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. Hancock et al
as 1:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cecil Bynum
Defendant:
Michael Hancock, Michael (I) Hancock, Keri Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
