Cases 21 - 30 of 31
ASCENSION BORGESS HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv00139
Plaintiff:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, IU HEALTH NORTH HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01386
Plaintiff:
HENRY COUNTY HEALTH, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00963
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone v. Jesse et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Kiel Stone
Defendant:
Steve Jesse, Brain McCall, Daniel Avitia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2018cv00266
Plaintiff:
COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF INDIANA, INC, EVANSTON HOSPITAL, PROMEDICA TOLEDO HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WATSON v. POLLARD-PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2015cv01167
Defendant:
IU HEALTH and NATYSHATI POLLARD-PHILLIPS
Plaintiff:
DEBRA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America et al v. Healogics, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00283
Defendant:
UF Health, Orlando Health, IU Health Goshen Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
