Cases 21 - 30 of 291
MINOR
as 2:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
IN RE: EDGAR HERMOSILLO MINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
IN RE: WHITLOCK
as 2:2023cv01578
Petitioner:
IN RE: JOHN WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: SINGLETON
as 2:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
IN RE: LOUIS SINGLETON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOYCE V CORSANICO ET AL
as 2:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
IN RE: JAY BOYCE and JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
DETECTIVE THOMAS CORSANICO and MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARQUEZ et al v. ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO MARQUEZ, ANALIA HERNANDEZ and EL ESPINNILLO LLC
Defendant:
ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, ABC CAPITAL RE LTD, ABC CAPITAL RE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RAINONE v. ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
FACUNDO RAINONE and DONATO Y FERMIN LLC
Defendant:
ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, ABC CAPITAL RE LTD, ABC CAPITAL RE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RAINONE et al v. ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
FACUNDO RAINONE and DONATO Y FERMIN LLC
Defendant:
ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, ABC CAPITAL RE LTD, ABC CAPITAL RE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
IN RE: TORRES
as 2:2023cv00402
Petitioner:
IN RE: JOEL TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
