Cases 21 - 30 of 14,812
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Douglas et al v. Sell et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Dalton Douglas
Defendant:
Steven J. Sell, TIMOTHY S. BENSLEY, Glenn Sobotka and others
Smith v. J. Frago et al
as 4:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
J. Frago, Officer Harrington and Sargent C. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01793
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01803
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mousavi v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ali Mousavi
Defendant:
Director Alejandro N. Mayorkas, US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. Randy Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PENA et al v. CARDONA et al
as 5:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
JULIO PENA and NANCY PENA
Defendant:
CHIEF ROXANNE CARDONA, OFFICER J ORTIZ, CHAD COVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
