Cases 21 - 30 of 36
REMEKIE v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv00079
Petitioner:
DONOVAN A. REMEKIE
Respondent:
MR. JAIME SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF: PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ring v. Sorber et al
as 2:2021cv05620
Petitioner:
Mark M. Ring
Respondent:
JAIME SORBER and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ring v. Sorber et al
as 3:2021cv02088
Petitioner:
Mark M. Ring
Respondent:
Jaime Sorber and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. SORBER
as 2:2021cv03477
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Tyrirk Harris
as 21-2285
Petitioner:
In re: TYRIRK HARRIS
Respondent:
JAIME SORBER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv02930
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAIME SORBER and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
AARON I. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv02896
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HARVEY
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAIME SORBER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv02891
Petitioner:
TYRIRK HARRIS
Respondent:
JAIME SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COIT v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv01568
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, OLIVERI, GILLARDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tirado v. Sorber, et al
as 5:2021cv01546
Respondent:
JAIME SORBER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LANCASTER COUNTY
Petitioner:
VICTOR TIRADO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
