Cases 21 - 30 of 138
DOURIS et al v. BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04201
Plaintiff:
CAYDEN MICHAEL DOURIS , RICHARD P. DOURIS and CARMELA M. DOURIS
Defendant:
BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. , PAULA TOWLE , JENNIFER COLLINS and others
Cross_claimant:
BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. , JENNIFER COLLINS and PAULA TOWLE
Cross_defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES , DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES , GREYSTONE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEKOVETZ v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2014cv03343
Plaintiff:
JAMES MEKOVETZ
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ, VALERIE HARR and CHRISTINE HAMMERSTONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
STACKHOUSE v. VELEZ et al
as 2:2014cv00523
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH STACKHOUSE
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ , VALERIE HARR and CHRISTINE HELLYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOUCESTER MANOR REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER, INC. v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv06875
Plaintiff:
GLOUCESTER MANOR REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, MARILYN TAVENNER, MARY O'DOWD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MATRANGOLO v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2013cv06289
Plaintiff:
MARIE MATRANGOLO
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRILL v. VELEZ et al
as 1:2013cv05643
Plaintiff:
ADA BRILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
TUCKER v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2013cv04973
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TUCKER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE and JENNIFER VELEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
