Cases 21 - 30 of 443
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDON v. HUMPHREY et al
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BRANDON
Defendant:
HUMPHREY, GUINN and BOSTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Curry v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jay Curry
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Other:
Michael Scopelitis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hester-Spann v. Franke et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Carren Franke, Jeremy K. Nix, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lybarger et al v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lybarger and Krystal Lybarger
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hester-Spann v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Carren Franke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANDUNK v. WARRICK COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
EMORY A. VANDUNK
Defendant:
WARRICK COUNTY, JIM SCHULER, GREG A. GRANGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
