Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Gangstee et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2010cv01004
Plaintiff:
Deanna Gangstee and Jordan Chambers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, John McGinness and Stephen Lecouve
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2010cv00664
Plaintiff:
William James
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Erik Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knanishu v. McGinness et al
as 2:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Knanishu
Defendant:
John McGinness, Brelji, - Jacoby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steve Badue v. John McGinness, et al
as 09-17766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE BADUE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCGINNESS and PETERSEN, # 1136
Wooten v. Temporini et al
as 2:2009cv03127
Plaintiff:
Mario Ngwazi Wooten
Defendant:
Temporini, Stoak and John McGinness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Badue v. McGinness et al
as 2:2009cv02859
Plaintiff:
Steve Badue
Defendant:
John McGinness and - Petersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Martin et al
as 2:2009cv02778
Plaintiff:
Louie Moreno, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin, Turrey, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeely v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2009cv02520
Plaintiff:
Dock McNeely
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crime, Justice & America, Inc., et al v. John McGinne
as 09-16956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRIME, JUSTICE & AMERICA, INC., a California corporation and RAY HRDLICKA, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCGINNESS, Sacramento County Sheriff
McNeely v. McGinness
as 2:2009cv02454
Petitioner:
Dock McNeely
Respondent:
John McGinness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
