Cases 21 - 30 of 98
MALLORY v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00983
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MALLORY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00833
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLARK
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGHEE et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00832
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MCGHEE and ELIGA MCGHEE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOMAX v. SPEISER et al
as 2:2016cv06367
Plaintiff:
KEVIN Z. LOMAX
Defendant:
JOHN SPEISER, LINWOOD NORMAN, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Otto, et al v. R. Williams, et al
as 16-3072
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT G. OTTO
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS, PERRY BETTS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and others
SEAGRAVES v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2016cv03126
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SEAGRAVES
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO , BRIAN REYNOLDS , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02245
Plaintiff:
CHERELE SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ALI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and JOHN SPEISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
TYREE REED
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO , BRIAN REYNOLDS , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSI v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06540
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROSSI
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
