Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Jones et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv10045
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones , Elijah Lynah and Adam Kinley
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, Supervisor C.O. John/Jane Doe # 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06741
Defendant:
City of New York and Police Officers John/Jane Does 1-2
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRAGG v. COHEN et al
as 1:2015cv07006
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
GERALDINE COHEN, MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, JOHN/JANE DOE 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staley v. Montgomery County et al
as 9:2014cv00894
Plaintiff:
Robert Staley
Defendant:
Montgomery County , Michael Amato , Michael Franko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03751
Plaintiff:
Victor Acevedo
Defendant:
The City of New York and John/Jane Doe #1 & 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boomer v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03249
Plaintiff:
Bobby Boomer
Defendant:
The City of New York, John/Jane Doe-1, Philips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacha v. Rovhsan
as 1:2014cv01998
Plaintiff:
Wassim Bacha
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-2 and Sadykhov Rovhsan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Perkins v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv01507
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Perkins
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, DeSousa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALDONADO v. DOMINGO et al
as 1:2013cv06673
Plaintiff:
JUNIOR MALDONADO
Defendant:
MATTO DOMINGO, WESTERN EXPRESS TRUCKING , WESTERN EXPRESS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Labidou v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02733
Defendant:
City of New York, John/Jane Does 1, 2, 3 etc. and Joseph Roschbach
Plaintiff:
Isaac Labidou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
