Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Joshua et al v. O'Melia et al
as 1:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Linaya J'veen Joshua and Frances Renee Perry
Defendant:
Robert O'Melia, Linda Dixon, N Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzgerald v. Griffin et al
as 1:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Nathan Griffin, Nance, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. May et al
as 1:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Terese Marie Meadows
Defendant:
Larry May, James Gibson, N Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller/Perry v. Norris et al
as 1:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Frances Renee Miller/Perry
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Dexter Payne, Phillip Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry/Miller v. Norris et al
as 1:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frances Renee Perry/Miller
Defendant:
Larry Norris, John Maples, Jr and James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Sherman et al
as 1:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton
Defendant:
David A Sherman, Stewart, John Maples, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Jones et al
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton
Defendant:
Jones, Murphy, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stratton v. Mays et al
as 5:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
Polly Elizabeth Stratton
Defendant:
Larry Mays and John Maples, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. Maples et al
as 1:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Polly Stratton
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Maggie Capel, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Maples et al
as 1:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
David Ray Evans
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Dexter Payne, John Heir, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
