Cases 21 - 30 of 102
Johnathan Johnson v. City of San Marcos, Texas, et al
as 15-50916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS DEFENDANT'S (LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT), JEREMY SEMEBRA, Individual Capacity, Official Capacity, LEE HARRIS, Individual Capacity, Official Capacity and others
Johnson v. Coons et al
as 1:2015cv00753
Defendant:
Robert Caine, Dr. Richard Coons, Judge David Glicker and others
Petitioner:
Johnathan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of San Marcos, Texas et al
as 1:2015cv00749
Defendant:
City of San Marcos Police Department, City of San Marcos, Texas Defendant's (Local Police Department), Lee Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnathan Johnson v. Gary Cutler, et al
as 15-50508
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY CUTLER, Hays County Sheriff and STATE OF TEXAS
USA v. Johnathan Johnson
as 15-50462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
USA v. Johnathan Johnson
as 15-50463
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
USA v. Johnathan Johnson
as 15-50387
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
USA v. Johnathan Johnson
as 15-50378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
Johnathan Johnson v. Hays County, et al
as 15-50358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, AUSTIN STATE HOSPITAL and others
Johnathan Johnson v. City of San Marcos, et al
as 15-50357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN MARCOS, WES MAU, Hays County District Attorney, individually and official, HAYS COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
