Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Wilkins v. Franczyk et al
as 6:2011cv06104
Plaintiff:
Melzar Ti-Shawn Wilkins
Defendant:
Kelly Herkey, Mark L. Kalinowski, Jodi Ludemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Walker v. Keith Smith
as 10-4034
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH SMITH, Warden
Washington et al v. PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.
as 3:2009cv00885
Plaintiff:
Mary Washington, Dorothy Washington, Catherine Green and others
Defendant:
PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P., PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P., PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WALKER et al v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84100
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY WALKER, JOHNNY WALKER, ESTER R. WALKER and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Floyd et al v. Keystone Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03887
Plaintiff:
Joseph Floyd, Joseph Floyd, Alicia Haynes and others
Defendant:
Keystone Industries, Inc. and Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Graham
as 1:2009cv00544
Petitioner:
Johnny Walker
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01092
Petitioner:
Johnny Walker
Respondent:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnny Walker v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-87661
Plaintiff:
Johnny Walker
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc
WALKER v. BAIRD & COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv87235
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY WALKER and JOHNNY WALKER
Defendant:
BAIRD & COMPANY, CAPCO PIPE COMPANY, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
