Cases 21 - 30 of 6,243
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #052
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrum v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Byrum
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee, Glenn Jacobs, Tom Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
John Eric Wells
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Jon Walton, Bargery Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manhead, LLC v. Various John Does et al
as 3:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Manhead, LLC
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Fox et al v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Troy J Fox and Jeanene Fox
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Maxwell Grayson Laughter, Town of Parrottsville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
GAMBLE V. SANGSTER ET AL
as 2:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GAMBLE
Defendant:
Tracey Sangster and John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Fox et al v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Troy J Fox and Jeanene Fox
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Maxwell Grayson Laughter, Town of Parrottsville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Haga v. Lawn Care and More Inc. et al (JRG3)
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gage Haga
Defendant:
Lawn Care and More Inc. and John C. Bushong
Webb v. First Realty et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
First Realty, Howard Glen McDonald, Robert Grimsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #058 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Doe #058
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
