Cases 21 - 30 of 1,263
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Caudill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06162
Plaintiff:
Teresa K Caudill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Patrick v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03195
Plaintiff:
Maureen K Patrick
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Stephens v Title Max
as 2:2023cv00359
Defendant:
Title Max and TMX
Plaintiff:
K L Stevens and K L Stephens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06075
Plaintiff:
Brian K Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Lidstrom et al v. Scotlynn Commodities Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Arlin K Lidstrom and Laverne Lidstrom
Defendant:
Scotlynn Commodities Inc and Ying H Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
