Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Wolfson v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08373
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wolfson
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Karyn Bruton, Stephen Bushansky, Shoshana Minzer and others
O'Dell v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08074
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle Armbrester and others
Stein v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08048
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle Armbrester and others
Jones v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06905
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Lawrence v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06873
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Stein v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06501
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Jones v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03424
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Michael J. Renna, Sarah M. Barpoulis and others
Khalil v. General Electric Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ahmed S. Khalil
Defendant:
General Electric Corporation, Clarkson University, Kevin M. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
