Cases 21 - 30 of 131
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Kitsap County
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc United States and McKinsey & Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Webb v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2021cv05761
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Kitsap County Government, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armand Calhoun v. Adison Richards, et al
as 21-35598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMAND R. CALHOUN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADISON RICHARDS, PHILIP THORNTON, JENNIFER AMMONS and others
Roberts v. City of Bainbridge Island et al
as 3:2021cv05165
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Kitsap County, Gary Simpson and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thomas Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larry Lloyd v. Fitzwater, et al
as 20-35955
Defendant / Appellee:
FITZWATER, Sgt. and LEWIS, C/O
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LLOYD
Defendant:
SENOVIA RIVAS, Nurse and MARK RUFENER, Chief, Kitsap County Jail
Stephenson v. Kitsap County et al
as 3:2020cv05993
Defendant:
WellPath and Kitsap County
Plaintiff:
Brandon R Stephenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubio v. Kitsap County Superior Court
as 3:2020cv05845
Petitioner:
Brandon J Rubio and Brandon James Rubio
Respondent:
Kitsap County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hordon v. Kitsap County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv05464
Defendant:
Andrew Aman, Austin Goff, Justin Childs and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Dirk Hordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Webb v. Gary Simspon, et al
as 20-35109
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY SIMSPON, Sheriff Kitsap County
Hamilton v. Kitsap County
as 3:2015cv05587
Plaintiff:
Brett Hamilton
Defendant:
Kitsap County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
