Cases 21 - 30 of 139
Peters v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00866
Plaintiff:
Faith L Peters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lindell, Nate v. Lutsey, Jean et al
as 3:2019cv00476
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell
Defendant:
Jean Lutsey, Psychologist Todd L. Hamilton, R.N. Mary H. Alsteen and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David S Quair v. A. Andres et al
as 5:2019cv00774
Defendant:
R. Broomfield, E. Munguia, T. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair, III and David S Quair, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beene, William v. Jess, Cathy et al
as 3:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Sgt. Weicker, Cathy Jess, C.O. Paul and others
Plaintiff:
William Beene
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv00352
Plaintiff:
Heidi L. Peters
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lindell, Nate v. Jess, Cathy et al
as 3:2018cv00895
Defendant:
John Does through, A.C.P. Susie Peters, Cpt VanLanden and others
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
David William Blood, et al v. Equifax, Inc, et al
as CAC/8:18-cv-00958
Plaintiff:
David William Blood , Laura Monica Casillas , Jesus Adan Ceja and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc and Does
David William Blood, et al v. Equifax, Inc, et al
as 8:2018cv00958
Plaintiff:
David William Blood, Laura Monica Casillas, Jesus Adan Ceja and others
Defendant:
Does and Equifax, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
