Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Thomas v. Cognasi, et al (MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00575
Plaintiff:
Nelson L. Thomas
Defendant:
Nicholas Cognasi , Officer Quinn , City of Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Ellington et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth L. Thomas
Defendant:
Edward Ellington and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lankster v. AT&T et al
as 2:2013cv00045
Defendant:
AT&T , Verizon Wireless , Apple Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Albert F. Lankster, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Thomas v. Craig et al
as 6:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Porscha L Thomas
Defendant:
Joe L Craig , M L Bowen and Double B Farm & Gin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bates et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01980
Plaintiff:
Diana L Thomas Bates , Larry E Bates , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01565
Plaintiff:
Royal L Thomas
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2012cv00305
Petitioner:
Darryle L Thomas
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Thomas et al v. Pepsico, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02396
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Thomas and Cynthia L Thomas
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc. and Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
