Cases 21 - 30 of 51
PEREZ v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2010cv00655
Petitioner:
JOSE PEREZ
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOFFMAN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DEVON BROWN, GEORGE W. HAYMAN, LYDELL SHERRER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SAPP et al
as 2:2009cv06388
Plaintiff:
BENJAMINE HALL
Defendant:
BRUCE W. SAPP and LARRY GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEMMENS v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv05985
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SEMMENS
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and ANN MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRANT v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv05566
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GRANT
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and ANN MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TYSON v. HAYMAN et al
as 1:2009cv05087
Petitioner:
MIKE TYSON
Respondent:
GEORGE HAYMAN and LARRY GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2009cv04802
Plaintiff:
DASHAUN WHITE
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MOUNTAINVIEW YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, LARRY GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLACE v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv04494
Petitioner:
SEAN WALLACE
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2009cv04406
Plaintiff:
KEEON JONES
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, GEORGE W. HAYMAN, LARRY GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIBLACK et al v. HAYMAN, et al
as 2:2009cv03944
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK, RILEY WALKER, EUGENE WILSON and others
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, ROBERT PATERSON, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
