Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Arunachalam v. McNamara et al
as 1:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Thomas S. Hixson, Brian J. McNamara, Raymond C. Clevenger, III and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Jeweltex Pension Plan v. Corcept Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02308
Defendant:
Joseph K. Belanoff, Renee D. Gala, Kimberly A. Park and others
Nominal Defendant:
Corcept Therapeutics Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABDUL-AKBAR v. STARK
as 1:2019cv02214
Plaintiff:
BRO. DEBRO ABDUL-AKBAR
Defendant:
JUDGE LEONARD P. STARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barcus et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv02212
Plaintiff:
Tajammal Hayat, Artis Francies, Heidi DeSesa and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv01830
Defendant:
G. Leonard Baker, Charles Robb, Joseph K. Belanoff and others
Nominal Defendant:
Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Lauren Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy v. Stark et al
as 1:2019cv01641
Defendant:
Leonard P. Stark, Colm F. Connolly and Richard G. Andrews
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaev v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01341
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Leonard Riggio, Scott S. Cowen and others
Plaintiff:
David Shaev
Scarantino v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01320
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Chapters Merger Sub, Inc., Leonard Riggio and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Kennedy v. The United States Courts et al
as 1:2019cv01311
Defendant:
Leonard P. Stark, The United States Courts, Richard G. Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kennedy v. United States et al
as 1:2019cv00893
Defendant:
United States, Leonard P. Stark and Richard G. Andrews
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
