Cases 21 - 30 of 96
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 3:2020cv20424
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, ANTHONY DIPIETRO and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLERING v. MORGAN STANLEY LLC et al
as 2:2020cv19964
Defendant:
MR. STEPHEN J LUCZO, MR. HUTHAM S OLAYAN, MR. JOSEPH MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALLERING v. MORGAN STANLEY LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06203
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE, MR. JOSEPH MILLER, MR. ROBERT H. HERZ and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02164
Defendant:
Nobuyuki Hirano, Jami Miscik, Thomas H. Glocer and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00527
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage, Mr. Joseph Miller, Mr. Robert H. Herz and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 1:2020cv09404
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER K. CAIN, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIPPINCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56773
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TRYON LIPPINCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campinha-Bacote v. Wolters Kluwer United States Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant:
ASSOCIATION OF WOMENS HEALTH, OBSTETRIC AND NEONATAL NURSES, Patricia A. Creehan, Cynthia Rudy and others
Plaintiff:
Josepha A. Campinha-Bacote
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
WILLIAMS v. WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
LINDA A. HYNES, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, DEPUTY CT. ADMIN. TASHESIA HICKMOND and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
