Cases 21 - 30 of 1,085
Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court
as 5:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
Zachary Lloyd Kalso
Respondent:
Butte County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Uber Technologies, Inc. et al v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 doing business as Principia Underwriters and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400588 doing business as Aspen Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Nuggets and Carats, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Nuggets & Carats, Inc. and Nuggets and Carats, Inc.
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Syndicate No. 3624 Subscribing to Policy No. MPL4029619.21, Hiscox, Inc. d/b/a Hiscox Insurance Agency in California, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lloyd Kalso
Defendant:
Butte County Superior Court, Corie Caraway, Brenna Burcell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kalso v. Butte County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lloyd Kalso, Erik Arthur Clarke and Robert Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
Butte County Jail, Butte County Sheriff Dept., Keefe Supply Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-2000527 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-2000527
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., CDN Logistics, Inc., Mobile Air, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
DexCom, Inc. et al v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10655
Plaintiff:
DexCom, Inc., CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. MC-1000283 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. MC-1000283
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., United Airlines, Inc., Does ONE through TEN and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Monarch Title Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No. SUANESB10204-2103 et al
as 2:2023cv10867
Plaintiff:
MONARCH TITLE COMPANY
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. SUANESB10204-2103, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. SUA6191-2203, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No. SUANESB10204 2103 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2023cv05829
Plaintiff:
Defense for Children International-Palestine, Al-Haq, Ahmed Abu Artema and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Antony J. Blinken and Lloyd James Austin, III
Amicus Curiae:
A Jewish Voice For Peace, Inc., Council on American-Islamic Relations, California (CAIR-CA), American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ms. L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2018cv00428
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Greg Archambeault and others
Petitioner:
Ms. L., Ms. C., Dora and others
Not Classified By Court:
Lesbi Martinez-Martinez and Ms. M. D-L
Amicus Curiae:
Michael Wishnie, et al., amici curiae, Children's Rights., Inc., et al., amici curiae and Scholars of Habeas Corpus and Constitutional Law
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
