Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Urquhart v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lamar Urquhart and Benjamin L. Urquhart
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
TOWNSEND v. GILSTER-MARYLEE CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR TOWNSEND
Defendant:
GILSTER-MARYLEE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cannady v. Polk County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cannady
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Rutherford County SBI, Polk County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02116
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRIGHT v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
JACKIE LAMAR BRIGHT
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLAND v. USA
as 1:2022cv00472
Petitioner:
RYAN LAMAR HOLLAND
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dennis v. Torrez et al
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Defendant:
FNU Torrez, FNU Cook, Whatt White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIGHT v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
JACKIE LAMAR BRIGHT
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, Sgt. Sim, Sgt. Walliy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIGHT v. BULLET, et al
as 1:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BRIGHT and Jackie Lamar Bright
Defendant:
LT. BULLET, OFFICER MCNIAL, OFFICER BARN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
