Cases 21 - 30 of 786
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pina v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Pina
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, FNU Lane and FNU Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Butler v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Trustee Jack Butler
Defendant:
Attorney Patrick K. Woods, Attorney Brandon Lane, Judge Andrew Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Allen v. Lane Bryant, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Rodney Allen
Defendant:
Lane Bryant Brands OpCo, LLC, Lane Bryant, Inc. and Apparel Holding Partnership, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Henderson v. Discovery Card Corporate Office et al
as 4:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Lane Henderson
Defendant:
Discovery Card Corporate Office, Roger C. Hochschild, John T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 9:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Defendant:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
