Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Lankford v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv00458
Petitioner:
David Steven Lankford
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Box et al
as 4:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Elvin Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Terry Box, FNU Lankford and Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00213
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Pharmaceutical Division and others
Plaintiff:
Darwin Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Douglas v. Haynes et al
as 4:2009cv00598
Plaintiff:
Ralph O Douglas
Defendant:
Theodore Haynes, Samuel D Adamo, Harry B Jones, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lankford v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00652
Petitioner:
David Steven Lankford
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pye et al v. City of Lancaster, Texas et al
as 3:2008cv00404
Plaintiff:
Clinton T Pye, Clinton T Pye, Ouida Pye and others
Defendant:
City of Lancaster, Texas, City of Lancaster, Texas, Jan Belcher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lankford v. Eletson Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00369
Defendant:
Eletson Corporation, Eletson Maritime, Inc. and M/T SPORADES her cargo, gear, tackle and appurtenances in rem
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lynn Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bullard et al v. BWXT Pantex, LLC
as 2:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jowell C Bullard, Jowell C Bullard, Jowell C Bullard and others
Defendant:
BWXT Pantex, LLC, BWXT Pantex, LLC and BWXT Pantex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
