Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Reynolds v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00950
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America, Larry Whitehead and Joseph Noone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Reynolds v. Whitehead et al
as 1:2013cv00294
Defendant:
Larry Whitehead and Joseph Noone
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stawbridge et al v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 7:2012cv01960
Plaintiff:
Lori Stawbridge , Clarence Campbell , Johnnie Mae Campbell and others
Defendant:
Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company , Larry Whitehead , Jack Leibforth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Reynolds v. Larry Whitehead, et al
as 11-3149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY WHITEHEAD, FBI and JOSEPH NOONE, FBI
Michael Reynolds v. USA, et al
as 11-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN GURGANUS, Prosecutor, LARRY WHITEHEAD, FBI Affiant and others
Reynolds v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv02602
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America, John Gurganus, Larry Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2010cv02044
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
Larry Whitehead, Joseph Neone and US Marshal, unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Reynolds v. Joseph Noone
as 10-3813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY WHITEHEAD, FBI and JOSEPH NOONE, FBI
Reynolds v. Whitehead et al
as 4:2010cv01514
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
Larry Whitehead and Joseph Noone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. Noone et al
as 3:2010cv00964
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
Joseph Noone and Larry Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
