Cases 21 - 30 of 904
Jones v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn Lee Jones
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government and Officer K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell et al v. Onsite Environmental, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
J. Lee Powell, Carla Powell and Quick Turn Anodizing, LLC
Defendant:
Onsite Environmental, Inc. and American Allwaste Onsite, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Sanders v. Wilber et al
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Sanders
Defendant:
James Wilber, Kelli Chapman, Patrick Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Purtell v. Clark
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Steven W Purtell
Defendant:
Robert Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Slone v. Perry County Fiscal Court et al
as 6:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Slone
Defendant:
Perry County Fiscal Court, Robby Slone, Deputy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Meador et al
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
William Ray Lee
Defendant:
Tim Meador, Dewayne Stone, Josh Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Townsend v. Harris
as 5:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Hunter Austin Lee Townsend
Defendant:
TJ Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. SSA
as 7:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
John Lee Perkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Welch v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Welch
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
